Merciful Plate

Other faiths · ethics and food

Interfaith Action for Animals and Food Justice

A step-by-step framework for congregations to move from shared values to better meals, education, procurement and public witness.

4 minute read9 sections10 sources

The short answer

Interfaith work succeeds when it builds on each community’s own language rather than claiming all religions secretly teach the same thing. Shared action can coexist with theological difference.

In short

  • Map stakeholders before announcing a policy: leaders, cooks, elders, young people, people with allergies, low-income members and those whose livelihoods involve farming.
  • Choose a measurable first step: plant-based default catering, one monthly meal, cruelty-free purchasing, a study series or sanctuary partnership. Publish what the step does and does not claim.
  • Pair moral language with operational detail — budget, recipes, protein, allergens, kitchen training and feedback. Values without logistics collapse onto volunteers.
  • Evaluate after a season. Count uptake, cost, waste and participation; listen for exclusion; revise. Durable change is iterative, not a purity test.

History and doctrine

Interfaith action on animals and food brings traditions together without flattening them. Initiatives such as the Interfaith Vegan Coalition, the Alliance of Religions and Conservation (1995–2019), the Parliament of the World's Religions and Faith for Animals have created spaces where Buddhist, Christian, Hindu, Jain, Jewish, Muslim, Sikh and other communities discuss compassion, stewardship and justice.

The Assisi Declarations (1986), organised by WWF, invited leaders of five faiths to state their tradition's view of nature; later meetings added others. The Parliament of the World's Religions has included animal ethics in its programmes, and the 2021 Faith Plans initiative encouraged religious bodies to commit to sustainability.

Shared values — mercy, non-harm, stewardship, justice, simplicity — are real, but so are differences: halal and kosher rules, Hindu and Jain dairy traditions, sacramental meals. Effective interfaith work honours each tradition's reasoning rather than inventing a lowest common denominator.

Key texts and how they are read

Assisi Declarations (1986)
Statements on nature from Buddhist, Christian, Hindu, Jewish and Muslim leaders.
Parliament of the World's Religions, Towards a Global Ethic (1993)
Commitment to non-violence and respect for life, including animals.
Faith for Earth (UN Environment Programme)
A UN initiative engaging faith communities in environmental action.
Claim check

Major traditions share values relevant to animals and food

Mercy, non-harm and stewardship appear widely.

Strong

Interfaith meals should be plant-based for inclusion

Plant-based food meets most dietary laws, though ingredients still matter.

Qualified

All religions teach veganism

No; traditions differ significantly.

Contested
A quiet scene connecting care for animals with shared food
Editorial image expressing care and shared life; it does not document a named community.

Positions within the tradition

A spectrum of positions

Learn before acting

Dialogue first

Share texts and practices, respect differences.

Plant-based common table

Shared action

Interfaith events adopt inclusive plant-based menus.

Joint campaigns

Coalition advocacy

Faith groups campaign together on factory farming and climate.

Testing the tradition against modern production

Factory farming affects all communities: workers of many faiths staff slaughterhouses, pollution affects neighbourhoods regardless of creed, and climate change harms everyone. Interfaith coalitions can speak with moral authority on welfare law, public procurement and farmer transition, especially when they avoid claiming more agreement than exists.

A shared plant-based table is also practical: it satisfies halal, kosher, Hindu, Jain, Sikh and Buddhist requirements more easily than most meat-based menus.

From principle to community practice

  1. Start with one well-sourced study session led with someone rooted in the tradition, including a serious dissenting voice.
  2. Make plant-based food the normal shared option while providing clear ingredient and allergen information.
  3. Review dairy, eggs, clothing, cleaning supplies, events and investments rather than treating one meal as the whole ethic.
  4. Pair personal change with support for workers, farmers in transition, sanctuaries and policies that reduce institutional harm.

Inside the kit: voices, devotion and resources

The umbrella Interfaith Vegan Coalition sheet describes its declaration, quarterly online meetings, advocacy kits, conferences, media work and the Compassion Project. It is an advocacy platform, not a comparative theology consensus.

Tradition-specific practices

  • Use the declaration as a discussion text and invite traditions to name both agreement and disagreement.
  • Hold quarterly exchanges, cross-faith meals, conferences and shared campaigns without erasing doctrinal difference.
  • Screen Thomas Jackson’s Compassion Project as advocacy media and discuss its argument critically.

Named voices and communities

  • Interfaith Vegan Coalition and its kit authors
  • Vegan spiritual leaders participating in its online conference and quarterly meetings
  • The Assisi declarations, Parliament of the World’s Religions and Faith for Earth as outside comparative context

Prayer, ritual and reflection

  • The coalition’s shared declaration is a voluntary advocacy commitment.
  • Its Compassion Project and press campaigns translate the declaration into public storytelling.

Books, films and organisations

Kit resources

  • IVC declaration, faith kits, quarterly meetings, online conference, campaigns and Compassion Project.
  • Comparative context: Assisi, Parliament of the World’s Religions and Faith for Earth materials, clearly identified as outside the supplied sheet.

Limits of the argument

  • The claim that religions “mandate harmlessness” or converge at their core on veganism is sweeping and contested. Shared action does not require pretending traditions teach the same thing.

Serious objections

Interfaith work dilutes tradition

Good interfaith work lets each tradition speak in its own voice; common action does not require common doctrine.

Religious groups should stay out of politics

Faith communities have long advocated for justice; animal welfare law is part of public ethics.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Interfaith Vegan Coalition?

A network producing faith-specific kits and resources; it is an advocacy source.

How do I plan an interfaith meal?

Choose plant-based dishes, label ingredients, avoid alcohol in cooking, and consult participants on specific needs.

Can we pray together?

Many interfaith events hold a moment of silence or let each tradition offer its own blessing.

Continue from within the tradition

Take these questions to a qualified teacher, leader or practitioner who knows both the tradition and your community.

Research trail

Sources and further reading

  1. 01Interfaith Vegan Coalition declaration and advocacy kits
  2. 02DefaultVeg implementation resources
  3. 03GreenFaith organising resources
  4. 04Interfaith Power & Light food and climate materials
  5. 05CreatureKind church-course model
  6. 06Unitarian Universalist Animal Ministry
  7. 07Jewish Veg and Dharma Voices for Animals community guides
  8. 08Assisi Declarations (1986)
  9. 09Parliament of the World's Religions, Towards a Global Ethic (1993)
  10. 10Faith for Earth (UN Environment Programme)

References are given so readers can check them in the primary sources. Hadith gradings and scholarly positions are summarised in good faith; where a text is disputed we say so. Verify before you rely on anything here.

Follow the thread

Continue reading

Share this page